Communicate the message – It all starts at the top. Communicate the green vision and actions plans to all in the organization. Have a clear public relations agenda and don’t shy away from your critics. Work with all stakeholders.
Look at the whole supply chain – talk to your partners and suppliers and get an understanding of their processes and systems. What are they doing better or worse than you? What can you learn from them and how can you help?
Understand the returns – have a look at packaging, equipment, waste, and product returns. What happens to all of this? What can your organization do to make the reverse logistics greener?
Reward ideas - focus on employees, suppliers and other partners. Develop clear plans to implement and reward new initiatives.
Take action – when things go wrong take action. Remember it is a process and don’t expect immediate results. Don’t focus too much on short term gain and keep the bigger picture in mind.
I recently visited the Tsukiji fish market in Tokyo. It is the biggest wholesale fish and seafood market in the world and is also one of the largest wholesale food markets of any kind. The market is located in Tsukiji in central Tokyo.
The market handles more than 450 different types of seafood at the markets more than 1,500 stalls. The first market in Tokyo was established by Tokugawa Ieyasu during the Edo period to provide food for Edo castle (now Tokyo). Around $20m dollars of fish and other foodstuffs are bought and sold at the market on trading days. The tuna auctions are a particular attraction and are a series of auctions in various parts of the market. Traders can sometimes be seen closely examining the fish with torches prior to bidding.
I recently spoke to Patsy Day, an intellectual property attorney from Rouse Legal based in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. Rouse is a leading global intellectual property firm, with offices in more than twenty countries. Rouse has been handling IP cases in Vietnam since 1997.
TN: Which sectors are most infringed?
PD: The sectors where we see most infringements are alcohol, clothing and pharmaceuticals. As the Vietnam market becomes more sophisticated, so do the infringements. Infringers have also become more IP savvy and we are seeing a move away from direct copying to “lookalikes”.
TN: What is important for companies entering the country?
PD: Vietnam has made considerable progress over the last couple of years with regards to intellectual property rights. However, there is still a gap between the law and the implementation of the law. This is important, as companies need to have confidence that their IP rights will be protected. Franchising is essentially an IP driven business and franchisors are concerned that they won’t be able to control their franchisees or stop third parties from imitating their brands.
TN: What advice would you give to franchisors?
PD: Protect your intellectual property. Register your trademarks, domain name and any copyright. Do your due diligence and pick a partner that understands the importance of IP. Get a strong contract in place with your franchisee. Many international franchisors use their standard agreements which have been developed over the years. This is a good thing as it makes it easier for the in-house legal department to manage. However, it is important to run it by a local lawyer. For example, some standard agreements have very detailed insurance provisions. The insurance market in Vietnam is still developing and the franchisee may not be able to obtain the level of insurance you require. You could be putting an obligation on them that, from a practical point of view, they cannot adhere to.
TN: How can franchisors assist franchisees with regards to IP rights?
PD: Education is very important. Communicate to franchisees the key objectives you would like to achieve with your brand. Franchisees need to have clear guidelines on how to use your brand properly.
TN: How can you track your brand?
PD: Do regular audits and keep an eye on the use of your brand. Ensure that the standards are being maintained. For many companies, their brand is essentially their biggest asset. You want to have control over your brand.
TN: For many companies, parallel imports are also a big issue. What can they do?
PD: It is very difficult to stop parallel imports because it is not illegal. Products are just imported through a different channel. Some brand owners will identify the weak link in their supply chain by tracing back the parallel products and then rely on contractual obligations to control the flow. It is, however, critical that you register your own trademarks. In the past a more relaxed attitude was to allow the distributor to register your trade marks in their name. However, when the relationship goes bad it is very difficult to recover your trademarks.
TN: The Danone and Wahaha trademark dispute in China was followed by many industry observers. What are the lessons for Vietnam?
PD: Do your due diligence carefully and deal with intellectual property disputes as they arise. Ensure your contracts have carefully drafted IP transfer clauses and that any intellectual property rights that are meant to be assigned, are in fact assigned and any licences registered, as appropriate. It is also important to look at the structure of your business in Vietnam and what role you will play in the company. In some cases a joint venture might not be the right option so companies should explore, for example, licensing agreements.
What is a two-tier distributor? They buy from manufacturers and sell to resellers.
What are their competitive advantages? Two-tier distributors can expand the retail footprint in emerging markets. They normally sell a diverse range of brands and control a large percentage of the local distribution in the telecom and the computer industry. Two-tier distributors understand local conditions and can negotiate much better lease terms with proprietors. In some cases they might even own their own buildings.
How can they add value? Smaller distributors understand the needs of retailer and have well established practices and systems to deal with local customers. Because they are closer to the customer, they are also a valuable source for customer feedback.
Do they provide additional services? They normally provide credit terms to small retailers. In a current credit tight market, this can be a big advantage.
How will it affect lead times? By making use of two-tier distributors, manufacturers can reduce lead times by moving goods closer to retailers.
How can manufacturers support two-tier distributors? Manufacturers can assist them with route planning and help them identify the potential outlet base. Training workshops can go a long way in developing the business and building relationships.
How can they avoid channel conflict with their own sales force? Manufacturers can restrict salesmen activities to certain channel, and avoid conflict with distributors.
Managing supplier relationships used to be a zero sum game. Most companies focused on short terms goals where price was the main focus. Bullying suppliers were commonplace in some organizations. Employees took great pride in “facing down suppliers” and relationships were viewed on “how much money we will make”. However, with the increase in outsourcing and volatility in commodities, supplier relationship management (SRM) has moved to the forefront of organizational strategy. Companies are spending increased time on their selection criteria and determining clear best practices to manage partner relationships. However, few companies have mastered supplier management and SRM is in its infancy.
The question of quality
With the increase in outsourcing and the growth in world trade, product quality is increasingly an important factor. Many companies in the pet food, toy and dairy industry are still reeling from recent quality scandals in China and other parts of Asia. These scandals have put increased pressure on companies, as consumers are progressively more concerned about product quality. These quality scandals of late, as well of those in the apparel industry over the past decade, have highlighted the importance of managing relationships and the importance of supplier tracking and auditing. The days where companies could plead “we don’t have control over our suppliers” are gone. Environmental concerns and an increased scrutiny of labour practices also are demanding improved supplier relationships.
Outsourcing to the “unknown”
With outsourcing to Asian countries on the increase, companies need to understand culture issues. Many companies have been burned when outsourcing manufacturing to countries such as India and China. Management practices that worked in one country are not necessarily going to work in another country and companies need to change the way they think and work in other markets. Country values are also different. For example, cutting legal corners is seen as a survival technique and is much more tolerated in some countries. It is important to understand the value system of each country and it is important to assume nothing.
Outsourcing to emerging markets provides companies with unique challenges. Companies must develop contingency plans as delivery delays are normally more frequent. As one executive put it, “getting on time deliveries from our Asian suppliers, is one of our key challenges”. Working in the “unknown” also provides companies with unique legal challenges. Foreign companies trading in China and India have complained in the past about unfair legal practices. Companies must avoid disputes and ensure contracts are clear to all parties involved. Do not assume all parties will read the fine print and try to avoid legal terms. Always aim to simplify matters for suppliers. Consult lawyers that not only understand local laws but also cultural issues. The interpretation of the law can differ from country to country and cultural issues need to be taken into consideration.
Technology
In recent years, companies have seen technological advances in managing supplier relationships. The day of managing suppliers with spreadsheets are gone, and SRM is increasingly complex. Companies are demanding increased visibility. The need for real time information is on the increase. Companies are investing significant resources in managing suppliers and the use of supplier relationship software is becoming more common place. Supply chain managers are increasingly using the web to collaborate and to communicate with supply chain partners.
Find the right partners
Previously, partner selection only focused on price, with value sometimes taking a backseat. Today, companies are spending increased time and resources to develop and implement a comprehensive supplier qualification process. Companies need to establish a strategic road map and clear selection criteria. For example, the selection criteria may include important components such as strategic vision, capability, capacity and environmental issues. Companies need to evaluate if potential suppliers meet their required standards. Furthermore, supplier selection is not just limited to procurement departments, and companies are increasingly making use of cross functional teams. Employing external agencies to monitor and track supplier relationships is also on the increase.
Building relationships
Companies must always act with the relationship in mind. Companies must have a clear relationship development plan for each partner with clear goals. Building trust is key in any relationship, and trust must be built at all levels of the organization, and not just at senior management level. For example, companies can introduce department induction programs and in some cases even embed suppliers in the organization. The more partners understand each others businesses, the better for all parties involved. With clear communication channels, partners will have the confidence to address problems head on.
Advantages of relationships
One of the key advantages of long term relationships is cost reduction. Companies work together to solve supply chain problems and learn from one another. Better collaboration and communication will lead to increased sales. Improved collaboration can also lead to better demand planning and route scheduling. For example, when Kellogg evaluated Tesco’s inventory levels it realized that most out of the stocks occurred in the middle of the week. Kellogg worked with Tesco and changed its delivering schedule to accommodate the retailer. By changing the delivery scheduled, Kellogg reduced stock outs, increased sales and improved both customer and consumer satisfaction. As the Kellogg example demonstrates, working with suppliers can provide mutual benefits to all parties involved.
In today’s world, companies require suppliers that are results orientated and are demanding increased speed from suppliers. Not all suppliers are equal and all suppliers need to be segmented. Segmentation is critical, as it will determine the importance of the partnership and how much time companies need to spend on building supplier relationships. All members of the supply chain must have clear accountability and each member of the team must be aware of his or her duties. Companies need to monitor compliance and implement and communicate clear Key Performance Indicators (KPIs). In today’s high speed world, SRM is on the forefront of any successful company. SRM has changed significantly over the last couple of years, and suppliers are now seen as an extension of the business.
Sri Lanka is currently waking up from years of civil war. There is a sense of optimism in the air and the country is most certainly open for business. In September I spent two weeks in the country and also had a chance to review a FMCG company’s distributor network. I jotted down a few distributor issues I spotted in the market.
Visual management- distributor staff can benefit enormously from Visual management. For example, a clear distribution process mapped out with required documents can be hugely beneficial to the distributor.
Focus – in most organizations in emerging markets, it is critical to focus on the absolute basics. In many cases, distributor management lack skills and knowledge. Don’t try to do too much. You are likely to lose focus and confuse distributor staff in the process.
What gets measured gets done- unfortunately this is not always the case. If you don’t follow-up and take action on what you are tracking it will not get done. Some companies are simply tracking too much information. Ask yourself the question, what is absolutely critical to our business right now?
Standardization makes simple – eliminate the guess work. Every time someone has to think about a process it takes time. Standardized processes will increase quality standards and ensure the same consistent service. Standardized processes will also make it easier to visualize processes with pictures and photos.
Complexity – if you keep adding SKUs to your business it will add to the complexity for the distributor. For example, an increase in the number of SKUs sold will increase the complexity of estimating sales and load forecasting. Can the distributor handle the level of complexity in their business? What do you need to do to assist them in the process?
Vietnam’s textile industry has increased significantly since normalizing relationships with the United States in the 1990’s. Vietnam was granted most favoured nation status (MFN) in December 2001, which led to a dramatic reduction in import tariffs in the US market. Vietnam’s induction to the World Trade Organization (WTO) in 2007 and the Vietnamese government’s strong support of the textile and garment sector, have provided strong incentives to attract foreign investors. The textile industry is now the second biggest exporter in Vietnam and is expected to become the biggest in 2009. However the financial crisis has had a severe affect on Vietnam’s textile industry, which has suffered from a slump in demand from key export markets in the US, Europe and Japan.
Labour cost advantage
In the textile industry, companies are increasingly looking for lower cost countries that can provide outsourcing opportunities. The rising cost of land and labour are diminishing China’s labour cost advantage and Vietnam is increasingly seen as a low cost sourcing alternative to China. Estimates are that wage levels in Vietnam are about one third of those in China’s coastal region. Companies that are chasing lower labour costs are increasingly moving production to Vietnam. In a 2008 Booz Allen Hamilton survey 88 percent of companies originally chose China for its lower labour costs. Of the companies surveyed, 55 percent believe China is losing its competitive edge to countries such as Vietnam. The survey also indicated that 63 percent named Vietnam as their top low cost sourcing alternative to China. However, costs may be rising. The Navigos Group, a leading recruitment solutions provider in Vietnam, announced early in the year that there had been a 16.47 percent increase in Vietnamese workers’ average gross salaries between April 2008 and March 2009.
Low cost location
However, low cost labour is hardly a competitive advantage in the long term. Labour cost keeps changing and today’s low cost location is not necessarily tomorrow’s viable outsourcing location. If it is not China or Vietnam, it could be Bangladesh or Cambodia. Ig Hortsmann, a professor of business economics at the University of Toronto’s Rotman School of Management notes that Nike originally off shored manufacturing to Japan. As labour costs increased, manufacturing was later moved to South Korea and Taiwan. When labour cost increased in South Korea and Taiwan, it was moved to China and later also to Vietnam. Justin Wood, a Director of the Economist Intelligence Unit Corporate Network in Singapore makes the point that in the last 15 years Vietnam has moved from a low to a middle income country. The move towards a middle income will likely put additional pressure on Vietnam’s low cost labour status.
The Vietnam advantage
Elisabeth Rolskov, founder of ER-Couture in Vietnam, notes that manufacturing advantages in Vietnam go beyond labour cost and the country has some competitive advantages compared to China. “Vietnam has very good embroidery skills and needle work”, says Rolskov. “A lot of designers and manufacturers need embroidery skills and Vietnam has kept in touch with its traditional roots,” she adds.
However, for local designers, Vietnam has limitations as a sourcing location. “Sourcing material, buttons and zippers from Guangzhou is much better,” says Rolskov. In Guangzhou you can find everything in air-conditioned shopping areas and the shopping experience is less hectic.” This can have a negative impact on a designer’s creativity as the designer is restricted by what is on offer in the local market.
Rolskov thinks Vietnam is currently a great location for smaller manufacturers as the market is more flexible. “China is more volume focused”, adds Rolskov, a view supported by Rebecca Lebold, director of apparel product and technical development at Lilly Pulitzer. “Vietnam has higher production minimums than many other countries. Lower minimums would allow smaller companies to source their product in Vietnam”, Lebold notes.
Intellectual property threat
For many companies outsourcing to Vietnam, intellectual property (IP) remains a concern. Within the fashion industry, IP is not as enforced as it is within the film and music industries. Designers can “take inspiration” and it is seen as a major driver for setting trends in the industry. The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) has called for stricter intellectual property enforcement within the fashion industry to better protect companies and promote competitiveness within the textile and clothing industries. “It is a hard thing to take care of and you just have to be faster than everybody else”, says Rolskov. For smaller designers and labels it is much easier to switch manufacturing. However to prevent the copying of designs is a challenging undertaking.
Infrastructure development
For Vietnam to advance as an outsourcing location, the textile industry supply chain needs to be considered. Local logistics are influenced by direct and indirect cost. In Vietnam’s textile industry raw materials are often imported, which increases cost compared with those countries able to source locally. Managing reverse logistics can also be a challenging undertaking in Vietnam. Procedures, processes and infrastructure are sometimes not in place to manage repairs, returns and warranties.
According to a new market research report from Transport Intelligence (Ti) entitled Vietnam Logistics 2009, the high cost of logistics remains one of the biggest stumbling blocks in Vietnam. According to TI analyst John Manners Bell, logistics costs are estimated at 25 percent of Vietnam’s GDP. Even with cheap labour cost, poor infrastructure remains a major barrier for entry. This is largely due to Vietnam being in the early stages of infrastructure development.
Many experts believe that China’s advanced infrastructure gives it a major competitive advantage. Electricity and transportation costs will likely come down even further and and this will have a significant impact on the total cost, even if their labour is more costly. The Vietnamese government is aware of this dynamic and has invested billions of dollars in the country’s infrastructure. The government is actively encouraging foreign direct investment in the country’s infrastructure. This is visible with projects such as the Cai Mep Container Port in the Mekong River Delta and the new Long Thanh airport that’s projected to be completed by 2015.
Through assessing the overall supply chain, rather than a singular focus on labour costs, it is easier to identify where Vietnam’s opportunities and challenges lie in the textile industry. While small scale designers and manufacturers take advantage of a flexible environment, infrastructure and logistics processes will need further investment to make Vietnam an outsourcing destination and source for tomorrow’s fashionista wardrobes.













